![]() In other words, the jury might have concluded that maybe Pettitte did "misremember" the conversation, as Clemens has claimed.ĭurham tried to contend that he addressed the matter in a different way. Pettitte, currently, what is your memory of what Mr. "I thought that what we would hear is, 'Mr. His testimony now before the jury is 'I don't know,' " the judge continued. "My understanding is that (Pettitte's) position is at this time, he is conflicted. "I was waiting for you to ask, and you didn't ask that," Walton said. He repeatedly berated Durham, who was also part of the government team last July when prosecutors showed the jury a snippet of inadmissible videotaped evidence, prompting the mistrial. The judge seemed to agree, openly wondering why Pettitte wasn't asked for a current, definitive recollection of the conversation. Clemens' lawyers moved to strike Pettitte's testimony about the 1999-2000 conversation as "insufficiently definitive." The government tried to salvage their witness, but prosecutor Steven Durham's follow-up questions were lacking - at least in the minds of Clemens' lawyers and, more importantly, U.S. Is it fair to say there is a "50-50" chance that Pettitte misunderstood? Might Pettitte have misunderstood when Clemens supposedly acknowledged using human growth hormone to Pettitte in a conversation during the 1999-2000 offseason? Pettitte, Clemens' longtime friend and former teammate, was on the stand for a second day in the trial that is to determine whether Clemens lied at a 2008 congressional deposition and hearing when he denied taking steroids and human growth hormone.ĭuring cross-examination, Clemens' lawyers got exactly the answers they wanted. Finally he cried out: "You're taking positions that are totally absurd to me." First, the exasperated judge criticized the questioning of Pettitte on Wednesday, then he ruled against prosecutors in another matter. WASHINGTON - With two short answers, Andy Pettitte called into question the validity of his testimony against Roger Clemens, part of a discouraging day for prosecutors in the retrial of the seven-time Cy Young Award winner.Īfter stumbling its way to a mistrial of Clemens last year, the government is struggling again in the retrial - to the point that the crux of Pettitte's testimony might be tossed out. You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |